Given the size and rapid growth of the US Patent Office—from ~3,000 examiners in 2000 to over 8,000 examiners in 2018—it’s no surprise that different patent examination styles have produced significant outcome variability in prosecution outcomes. Examiner statistics reflecting this variability are popping up everywhere, but how can you actually use this data to improve your practice?

2-Minute Webinar Preview

In this webinar, we’ll give you five, easy-to-implement tips for incorporating data into your workflow.

You will also learn:

1) How using examiner statistics can improve prosecution outcomes
2) Why some of the most common examiner metrics can be misleading
3) Ways you can get up-to-date with current prosecution practices

Watch the Recording

Related Content

Setting the Tone of Prosecution with Patent Analytics There is no perfect formula for prosecuting a patent, but there is plenty of information out there that can be used to help anticipate a patent examin...
Patent Litigation and “The Ice Cream of the Future” Dippin’ Dots are enjoyed around the world. The delicious ice cream pellets can be found most commonly at amusement parks and have been known to hit th...
Webinar Recording: What the CAFC’s Recent 101 Decisions Mean for Software and Wireless Devices Listen as Gene Quinn, founder and president of IPWatchdog.com, Bob Stoll,Co-Chair of the IP Practice Group at Drinker Biddle, and former Commissioner ...

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close